Rank #1 in Engineering
Aisha Steel Mills Limited (ASL) delivered a clear first-quarter recovery for the three months ended September 30, 2026. Revenue almost doubled, gross margin improved, finance cost declined and profit after tax rose to Rs336 million from Rs82 million. The improvement was grounded in an 85% increase in sales volume rather than an unexplained accounting swing.
The result is encouraging, but it is not yet a clean cash-backed turnaround. Inventory increased by Rs3.12 billion in three months, operations consumed Rs2.25 billion of cash, and the company relied on new equity funding to finance working capital and capital expenditure. Earnings momentum is positive; cash conversion and inventory discipline are now the critical tests.
These are AlphaGen model outputs, not figures reported by the company: Alpha QoQ Score 60.66; TTM Performance Score 97.34; 3Y Business Perf Score 52.53; Sector Leadership Score 75.1006.
The largest driver was physical throughput. ASL sold 80,053 tonnes during the quarter, 36,677 tonnes more than a year earlier. Exports rose to 8,634 tonnes from 5,856 tonnes, but most of the absolute growth still came from total demand rather than exports alone. Production of 90,140 tonnes exceeded sales by roughly 10,087 tonnes, which helps explain why inventory increased even as revenue accelerated.
Revenue increased by Rs8.58 billion year on year. Because sales volume rose 84.6% while revenue rose 90.6%, implied revenue per tonne increased only modestly—about 3.2% by calculation. That suggests the recovery was predominantly volume-led, with a smaller contribution from pricing or mix. The filing does not provide a formal price/mix bridge, so this interpretation should be treated as arithmetic rather than management guidance.
Gross profit increased by Rs1.01 billion, outpacing revenue growth. Gross margin expanded by about 99 basis points to 10.74%. Management attributes the improvement to higher volumes and better gross margin. Greater production can improve fixed-cost absorption, but the company does not quantify how much of the margin gain came from utilization, steel spreads, product mix, currency or inventory effects.
Distribution expense increased 19.8% to Rs240 million, while administrative expense increased 30.8% to Rs391 million. Together these costs rose by about Rs131 million, far below the Rs1.01 billion gross-profit increase. After exchange loss, other income and expenses, and finance cost, profit before levy and tax reached Rs701 million from Rs195 million.
Finance cost fell 7.6% to Rs485 million even though period-end total borrowings were slightly higher than at June. The reduction contributed about Rs40 million to the year-on-year improvement. The result therefore benefited from financing relief, but the earnings recovery did not depend on finance cost alone: the expansion in gross profit was the dominant bridge.
Profit before tax rose to Rs528 million from Rs20 million. After tax of Rs192 million, net profit reached Rs336 million. The tax charge was substantially higher than last year’s unusual net tax reversal of Rs62 million, so the improvement in after-tax profit is particularly notable: operating gains more than absorbed a Rs254 million adverse swing in taxation.
Demand evidence supports management’s explanation. The Pakistan Automotive Manufacturers Association reported that passenger-car sales increased 43% year on year during July–September 2026. ASL also cited better demand from white goods and general engineering. The auto data does not prove ASL-specific volumes, but it independently supports a stronger demand environment for downstream flat-steel users.
Balance-sheet repair also continued in selected areas. Current assets exceeded current liabilities by Rs6.90 billion at September 30, compared with Rs3.32 billion at June 30. The current ratio therefore improved to roughly 1.29 times from 1.13 times. Equity increased to Rs29.16 billion from Rs25.83 billion, assisted by the quarterly profit and new ordinary shares issued during the period.
Cash conversion was the principal weakness. Net cash used in operations was Rs2.25 billion, versus Rs556 million generated in the comparable quarter. The biggest movement was working capital: inventory absorbed Rs3.12 billion, prepayments rose sharply and trade payables fell by Rs2.04 billion. Lower receivables released Rs1.39 billion, but this was not enough to offset the other uses of cash.
Inventory reached Rs21.52 billion, equal to about 70% of current assets and 40% of total assets. Production exceeded sales during the quarter, while management also highlighted elevated freight and insurance costs linked to regional conflict. A larger inventory buffer may support future deliveries, but it also increases exposure to steel-price movements, exchange rates and funding costs. The company does not disclose enough in this results packet to separate raw materials, work in process and finished goods or quantify any inventory holding gain.
Liquidity is therefore less comfortable than the current ratio alone suggests. Cash and trade receivables totaled only about Rs2.99 billion, while short-term borrowings were Rs15.62 billion. Much of the current-asset base consisted of inventory and advances/prepayments. The improved current ratio is real, but quick liquidity remains dependent on stock conversion and continued bank support.
Capital expenditure added another Rs644 million cash outflow. ASL funded the quarter through financing inflows of Rs3.27 billion, principally Rs4.59 billion of proceeds from ordinary-share issuance, partly offset by net loan repayments, interest and preference dividends. Closing cash rose to Rs876 million from Rs502 million, but without the equity raise the operating and investment cash deficit would have been difficult to absorb.
Total borrowings increased only 2.3% to Rs15.85 billion from June, which is modest relative to the working-capital expansion. Even so, most debt remained short term. That structure makes earnings sensitive to benchmark rates and rollover conditions. The State Bank of Pakistan increased its policy rate by 50 basis points to 12% on October 26, after the quarter closed; this did not cause the reported quarter’s finance-cost decline, but it raises the hurdle for further relief.
The exchange loss increased to Rs46 million from Rs10 million. Other expenses also rose to Rs92 million from Rs10 million, mainly because of a Rs36 million donation and Rs56 million provision for workers’ profit participation and welfare funds. These items partly offset operating gains but did not change the direction of the result.
Management said international hot-rolled coil prices stayed near US$500 per tonne FOB China during the quarter, while freight and insurance remained elevated. HRC is the key feedstock for cold-rolled and galvanized steel. A stable HRC price can help planning, but ASL’s realized spread depends on exchange rates, freight, duties, product mix and the timing of inventory purchases; none of those components is quantified in the filing.
On the competitive side, management expects local producers to gain market share following the application of sales tax in FATA/PATA and National Tariff Commission enforcement against circumvention. The NTC continues to list anti-dumping measures on cold-rolled and galvanized coils, including an anti-circumvention extension for galvanized products from China. This is supportive policy context, but the size and timing of any ASL-specific benefit remain uncertain.
The quarter extends the recovery visible in FY2026. Full-year FY2026 revenue was Rs54.24 billion versus Rs33.75 billion in FY2025, while net profit recovered to Rs981 million from a Rs1.35 billion loss. Yet the business remains cyclical: annual gross margin ranged from about 4.9% to 20.3% over the past six years, and finance costs were material in every year.
The current quarter’s 10.74% gross margin was below the 14.51% recorded in the immediately preceding June quarter but above the 9.74% year-earlier level. The sequential comparison should be interpreted carefully because the June quarter was derived from full-year and nine-month figures, whereas September is a directly reported quarter. The useful conclusion is that profitability is positive and materially better year on year, not that margins have permanently reset.
At September 30, reported debt was Rs15.85 billion versus equity of Rs29.16 billion, or about 0.54 times on a simple period-end basis. This is substantially healthier than earlier high-leverage years, but cash flow—not just accounting leverage—will determine whether the improvement persists.
ASL’s first quarter was a genuine operating recovery: volumes, revenue, gross profit and earnings all improved, and the tax line did not artificially create the result. The main reservation is that reported profit did not translate into operating cash. The next stage of the turnaround must therefore come from converting inventory into cash, maintaining the gross spread and limiting reliance on external funding. Until that happens, the result is strong but still working-capital intensive.